Data Profiles - profile feedback #213
Labels
21
Hazard! Activity is very complex and should be broken down into smaller activities
Data Profiles
Anything relating to Data Quality Profiles
Name quality:
Excluded records with additional spatial quality issues:
Excluded records with location uncertainty:
• This record is assumed to be WGS84, but there’s otherwise nothing wrong. So the missing datum is enough to exclude a record?: https://biocache-dq-beta.ala.org.au/occurrences/1618d997-20e7-4dc0-ac10-c43850bc1b8e
• This record is of a conservation listed taxon, excluded because the collection date (Event) is missing, but we have supplied that data, maybe it is withheld because of conservation listing? That wouldn’t be a good reason to exclude these records? Similarly a partial date could be perfectly acceptable in some cases. https://biocache-dq-beta.ala.org.au/occurrences/410282eb-7912-42a4-b726-5359d6aec04a
. If the identification date is incomplete (year 2010) but the collection date was the same year (2010-11-25) then the record is excluded because the identification date was before the collection date. I guess it’s the way incomplete dates are handled (2010-01-01).
https://biocache-dq-beta.ala.org.au/occurrences/43fbe4cb-c33f-4ccb-967d-697469107981
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: