-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Speed of the simulation on HPC #477
Comments
HI @zyh929 that does seem unusually long. Are you using any constraints? |
Hi @rs028 |
@zyh929 constraints are usually what slows down the model. A runtime of 13 hours for a 2 hours model with no contraints is definitely unusual. What happens if you run the tests? How long does it take to complete the testsuite? Parallelization is not implemented at the moment. The note in #479 is a reminder for future work. It is quite possibe that performance will improve with parallelization but it's likely to be quite a bit of work to do and I can't give a timeline of when it is going to happen unfortunately. Of course if you have the capability and/or the resources to look into that, it would be wonderful :) |
Hi @rs028 |
No but it could provide some information on the problem. You should only need numdiff and not run the unit tests, if you don't wnat to install FRUIT. |
@rs028 I really appreciate that you answer my mind of doubt. It takes just 1-2 seconds to run the testsuite on my machine. So I try to modify “maximum solver step size”, but it doesn't seem to improve the simulation speed. |
Then I would think it is the model you are trying to run that is the problem. Can you share the configuration files? you can send to me by email rob.sommariva @ gmail.com |
@rs028 I get it now, Thank you for all your assistance. |
Hello
The model takes 13 hours to run a 2-hours simulation on HPC when the entire MCM chemical mechanism is used. I’m not sure whether this simulation speed is normal. I was wondering if there are some methods to improve the simulation speed.
Thank you very much for your kind consideration. I would appreciate any help you can offer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: