-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Faster re-compute with new evaluation grid #85
Comments
Yes, this should be possible in theory. If I'm not mistaken, it would at least require an additional NumCalc command line parameter and either a manual or scripted edit of the project folder (add grids and update NC.inp files) or a corresponding option in the Blender export script mesh2input.py. I can't estimate the effort for the first step, but the second step would probably take more time than I currently have. @schaastrommla - what do you think? |
I will have a closer look as soon as possible. In principle I see no problem, we just have to be careful not to overwrite already computed results. But it should be possible with one or two command line parameters. |
Hi, just in case you are looking into updating NumCalc - one more improvement that would help a lot with Evaluation Grids is:
To avoid error with the same node IDs in multiple Evaluation grids. |
Hi All, Thanks for taking a look at this. Sounds like it is a definite possibility. Looking forward to hearing how it works out. cheers, |
Update: A first version is now in https://github.com/Any2HRTF/Mesh2HRTF/tree/feature/run_numcalc_from_precomputed_boundary_data but requires manually manipulating the project folder. If anyone is interested in making the option available through the Python or Matlab API, I'm happy to discuss. I fear I won't find time for that soon. It would also be an option to only document the command line tool and merge release it as a feature... |
Thanks for this great tool! I was wondering, is there a simple way to run a new evaluation grid for an already-completed Mesh2HRTF calculation? I understand that an evaluation grid can have any number of points in it but if I do want to go back to a previously computed instance with a new set of evaluation grid points I'd like not to have to re-compute the boundary element variable data since that takes a lot of time to do. Thanks for your time and effort.
ToDo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: