Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spectral output of radiation from a vibrating element on a rigid sphere #131

Open
mayuravaani opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@mayuravaani
Copy link

I'm working on tutorial, and I've noticed a difference in the spectral output between the results obtained from mesh2hrtf.output2hrtf() and those derived from an analytical solution. The magnitude of high-frequency components appears to be higher than that of low frequencies, which contradicts the expectations based on the analytical solution.
Please provide an explanation for this disparity and suggest possible ways to address it. I've attached the output from Mesh2HRTF.
Screenshot_20240527_143222

@f-brinkmann
Copy link
Contributor

My guess is that you are using a volume velocity source ('Left ear', 'Right ear', or 'Both ears' in the Blender export plug-in) without referencing, hence the rise of the magnitude with frequency. If this is the case, this shows what needs to be done.

@mayuravaani
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your prompt response.
Here, we get HRTF_Default.sofa and HRIR_Default_2D.sofa files as output from output2hrtf. Do they represent the pressure at the evaluation grids? And when we use inspect_sofa_files we get spectrum results as (front, back, left and right). Do they represent the pressure at the evaluation grid or on the mesh of the object? Can you please clarify this? Thank you.

@f-brinkmann
Copy link
Contributor

I checked the documentation and see that it's might do a better job to explain whats going on - so I gave it a little do-over. Does this clarify things:

Screenshot 2024-06-03 at 08 50 39

If you find more places that good give more information, feel free to comment here:
#133

Apart from that, it might also help to go over our free paper:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants