You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the QC claim in the to-be-assembled block is the same (same block number and strong/weak status) as the QC claim in the previous block, then the QC should not be included in the block extension.
Also, within the setfinalizers host function, assert that the sum of the weights is greater than or equal to the threshold.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
arhag
changed the title
IF: Bring back is_needed to avoid adding redundant QCs to blocks
IF: Bring back is_needed to avoid adding redundant QCs to blocks; enforce sensible finalizer policy in setfinalizers
Jan 24, 2024
If the QC claim in the to-be-assembled block is the same (same block number and strong/weak status) as the QC claim in the previous block, then the QC should not be included in the block extension.
Also, within the
setfinalizers
host function, assert that the sum of the weights is greater than or equal to the threshold.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: