Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Efficiency of DACLIP-IR #68

Open
Luciennnnnnn opened this issue Aug 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Efficiency of DACLIP-IR #68

Luciennnnnnn opened this issue Aug 4, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Luciennnnnnn
Copy link

Luciennnnnnn commented Aug 4, 2024

Hi, interesting work! I have a few questions I would like to ask:

  1. What is the parameter count of the U-Net used in your model?
  2. Is this a pixel domain model or a latent domain model?
  3. Compared to methods based on Stable Diffusion, is your method more efficient (in terms of training and inference)?

Any help would be appreciated!

@Luciennnnnnn Luciennnnnnn changed the title Efficientcy of Efficiency of DACLIP-IR Aug 4, 2024
@Algolzw
Copy link
Owner

Algolzw commented Aug 7, 2024

Hi thank you! 1) Our U-net uses 48.9M parameters and you can find the details in Table 8 in our paper. 2) Our method is in the pixel domain but you can definitely implement a latent version. 3) It's hard to compare with the Stable Diffusion since it can use various sampling acceleration methods.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants