Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

review Request 1 BLD requests #80

Closed
dckc opened this issue Feb 23, 2022 · 13 comments
Closed

review Request 1 BLD requests #80

dckc opened this issue Feb 23, 2022 · 13 comments

Comments

@dckc
Copy link
Member

dckc commented Feb 23, 2022

applicants, see Request 1 BLD

Hello validators!

For the purpose of decentralization, we'd like to grant 1 BLD to folks who apply in good faith. We'd like to delegate this to a group of approximately 7 of the validators who are receiving BLD delegation from Agoric in return for a pledge of support of community growth activities.

We have a discord channel for coordination: #validator-1-bld.

We would like you to vet that the applicant

  1. actually has a node running and
  2. is distinct from everyone already running a validator.

Please use github reactions and/or comments to volunteer to serve in this capacity.

cc @jeetraut @michaelfig

road not taken: multi-sig

We would supply you with, say, 50 BLD to start. You could perhaps disperse it using a 2-of-7 multi-sig cosmos account (or 3-of-7?)

road not taken: knack form

We had sketched a form... https://validateagoric.knack.com/agoric-dev#validator-1-bld-program

@dckc
Copy link
Member Author

dckc commented Feb 23, 2022

Based on your pledges, I nominate @clawmvp (#16 01node) , @iicc1 (#25 Stakely.io), @Gotogu (#3 wave), @alexandruast (#60 stake.systems), @johndoe24873 (#15 johndoe), @hyehan (#79 Blockapsis), and @paddyson79 (#58 pathrocknetwork) .

Please use github reactions and/or comments to offer to serve in this capacity. Or follow up in Agoric discord.

@dckc dckc changed the title administer 1 BLD decentralization grants (DRAFT) administer 1 BLD decentralization grants Feb 23, 2022
@nodestake
Copy link
Contributor

nodestake commented Feb 23, 2022

Sounds good.
My node is ready. I have filled out the form.
Looking forward the agoric more decentralization.

@paddyson79
Copy link
Contributor

This is a great idea. I'm in. Will go through the form later.

@aditya-manit
Copy link
Contributor

I would be happy to pitch in if we need more folks :)

@jeetraut
Copy link
Contributor

jeetraut commented Feb 23, 2022

name entity Node ID wallet address
Hai Tran Thanh TC Network 462aa5d3568bba44d167865825d65f7f947b337a agoric188xyq72fveuuvgk7lkht964jhgtc2cw0l86r7j
BINBIN WU NodeStake.top 3c94a2a7e90aa98fc7f01fa96b22b6d9721dc285 agoric1nkhsz0uk0d8qd4p7unrwej0j3ne8acpk447cvf

@dckc
Copy link
Member Author

dckc commented Feb 23, 2022

@jeetraut where did that info about TC Network, NodeStake.top come from? Did you get those from the knack form?

@paddyson79 what did you mean by your reply? Are you saying that yes, sending 1 BLD to those wallet addresses would serve decentralization? It looks like we already have a TC Network create-validator transaction . Did they already get 1 BLD somehow?

@jeetraut
Copy link
Contributor

@dckc Correct, these two were collected from the Knack form.

@dckc
Copy link
Member Author

dckc commented Feb 24, 2022

We have a discord channel for coordination: #validator-1-bld.

@paddyson79
Copy link
Contributor

@jeetraut where did that info about TC Network, NodeStake.top come from? Did you get those from the knack form?

@paddyson79 what did you mean by your reply? Are you saying that yes, sending 1 BLD to those wallet addresses would serve decentralization? It looks like we already have a TC Network create-validator transaction . Did they already get 1 BLD somehow?

Yeah sorry about the confusion. TC network has created their validator as you mentioned, so they shouldn't receive more BLD. Don't know where they got it from.

@dckc
Copy link
Member Author

dckc commented Feb 24, 2022

this just in: never mind the multi-sig idea. Please just prepare a list of vetted addresses where Agoric should send 1 BLD.

@dckc
Copy link
Member Author

dckc commented Feb 26, 2022

Congrats to NodeStake.top, the first validator to come on board by way of Agoric's Request 1 BLD process, demonstrating that the our blockchain is increasingly decentralized.

On Jan 28, Agoric announced a Validator Delegation Program, where validators would be selected both on the basis of their competence and a pledge to support infrastructure and community growth.

The Agoric blockchain is increasingly decentralized. Anyone can start a node that follows the chain, but in order to get into the market for top 100 validators that participate in consensus, they have to have at least 1 BLD so they can execute a create-validator transaction.

Agoric encourages node operators to Request 1 BLD. We are grateful to the group of validators who have agreed to help us review such requests as part of their support of community growth.

Alan | NodeStake.top made a request that Agoric send 1 BLD to agoric1nkhsz0uk0d8qd4p7unrwej0j3ne8acpk447cvf so that their node, which is running and caught up, can create-validator and compete for delegation and a spot in the voting set.

This request was reviewed and approved by two of our reviewers:

Agoric delivered the 1 BLD:

And now we have a new validator:

@dckc dckc changed the title administer 1 BLD decentralization grants review Request 1 BLD requests Feb 26, 2022
@dckc
Copy link
Member Author

dckc commented Mar 19, 2022

FYI... progress on a relevant bot:

https://github.com/Agoric/testnet-notes/blob/1bld-bot/subm/src/request1bld.js
a61de7c test(request1bld): find endorsements on recent relevant messages
... Agoric/testnet-notes#44

This was referenced Mar 25, 2022
@dckc
Copy link
Member Author

dckc commented Dec 19, 2022

Now that liquid BLD is result available from staking rewards and exchange listings, this program is no longer necessary.

@dckc dckc closed this as completed Dec 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants