You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Olivier:
I do not think that having always a subgroup \1 for a one variable mesh
is good. It is too complex...
We have the \1, \2, ... only for meshes which are cartesian products.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So in the case of only 1 mesh (e.g. only one spin-less Matsubara frequency) there would only be the 'mesh' entry not /mesh/1. Do I understand this correctly?
Olivier:
I do not think that having always a subgroup \1 for a one variable mesh
is good. It is too complex...
We have the \1, \2, ... only for meshes which are cartesian products.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: