You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've now gotten three separate reports from users that various simulations have proven unstable, usually originating at the pole. Based on my reading of the reports there seems to be a common theme of using excise_polar_flux, and the affected versions seem to be 2024.9 and up. Please feel free to post plots or diagnostics in this issue, because I am having a very hard time reproducing the issue on any of my builds or hardware.
Given the common theme, I'd first advise disabling excise_polar_flux -- and if that doesn't work, revert to 2024.5.1 unless you need the new features in 2024.9 (which included very little for ideal GRMHD except excise_polar_flux). If simulations fail with 2024.5.1 please let me know, since I'm working under the assumption this is a 2024.9 thing.
Two other mitigations to try, if you need excise_polar_flux to stay on or continue to experience the issue in 2024.5.1:
Lowering the CFL condition, in case the issue is timestep related
If either of these helps I'd be very interested to know.
Currently the PR #126 just disables excise_polar_flux by default with warnings, but any real work toward fixing this thing should end up there, i.e. in the branch fix/excise-flux-bad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've now gotten three separate reports from users that various simulations have proven unstable, usually originating at the pole. Based on my reading of the reports there seems to be a common theme of using
excise_polar_flux
, and the affected versions seem to be 2024.9 and up. Please feel free to post plots or diagnostics in this issue, because I am having a very hard time reproducing the issue on any of my builds or hardware.Given the common theme, I'd first advise disabling
excise_polar_flux
-- and if that doesn't work, revert to 2024.5.1 unless you need the new features in 2024.9 (which included very little for ideal GRMHD exceptexcise_polar_flux
). If simulations fail with 2024.5.1 please let me know, since I'm working under the assumption this is a 2024.9 thing.Two other mitigations to try, if you need
excise_polar_flux
to stay on or continue to experience the issue in 2024.5.1:imex
driver, in case the issue is related to boundary conditions (i.e., WIP: Stop running unnecessary UtoP at boundaries #128)If either of these helps I'd be very interested to know.
Currently the PR #126 just disables
excise_polar_flux
by default with warnings, but any real work toward fixing this thing should end up there, i.e. in the branchfix/excise-flux-bad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: