You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is more of a nice-to-have feature, I wonder what do you think about ability to run two local psql clusters: one for graph stuff and another one for everything else.
The reason for this is streaming replication which can only work for a cluster as a whole. While doing streaming replication I've noticed that graph sync stuff generates the majority of replication traffic while actually being a disposable data which does not need to be backed up. If graph data can be moved to a different cluster then replicating of important node data can be more efficient.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
This is more of a nice-to-have feature, I wonder what do you think about ability to run two local psql clusters: one for graph stuff and another one for everything else.
The reason for this is streaming replication which can only work for a cluster as a whole. While doing streaming replication I've noticed that graph sync stuff generates the majority of replication traffic while actually being a disposable data which does not need to be backed up. If graph data can be moved to a different cluster then replicating of important node data can be more efficient.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions