Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GAS relayer support #19

Closed
Graeme-Code opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

GAS relayer support #19

Graeme-Code opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
ts This issues is related to ts lib changes

Comments

@Graeme-Code
Copy link

Hi,

This ticket will not be super in-depth but more posing a question. One of the largest usability issues in ethereum for people who have not used a Dapp before is GAS. Would it be possible for the CPK to facilitate transactions on behalf of the user and covers their GAS costs?

@cag
Copy link
Contributor

cag commented Feb 25, 2020

Hey Graeme,

I think this is related to #13

Anyway, currently, not easily. There's not official functionality offered by this kit, but in principle it's possible. Basically, users would have to sign a transaction executable by execTransactions off of the predetermined Safe, and then pass this signed transaction to a generous relayer.

I'll keep this open in order to allow this use case to be further expanded if that is desirable, but currently, there are no plans to implement this.

@pimato
Copy link

pimato commented Feb 27, 2020

@cag we would love to see this feature beeing added as it gives all other clients like metamask and even hardware wallets all those nice features the gnosis safe is currently providing. Some people just don`t want to move all their funds into a mobile native smart wallet right now.

We are going to use the proxy-kit in two of our products now and it would be important for us to have this feature to be added as our goal is to have the best user experience.

@rmeissner rmeissner added contracts This issue is related to contract changes ts This issues is related to ts lib changes labels Apr 1, 2020
@germartinez germartinez self-assigned this Apr 17, 2020
@cag cag mentioned this issue May 1, 2020
3 tasks
@rmeissner rmeissner removed the contracts This issue is related to contract changes label Jun 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ts This issues is related to ts lib changes
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants