You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When we designed the current CI/CD system for deploying hubs as it currently stands, we did so with the principle that there'd only be one staging hub per cluster. Shared clusters would share the staging hub as it was supposed to be a canary deployment. Hence the deployer by design only looks for one staging hub per cluster.
However, we've been terrible at enforcing that principle, as evidenced by the existence of the ucmerced-staging hub. And that means that these hubs don't get automatically updated by the CI/CD pipeline. So we should probably do a refactor of the deployer and CI/CD pipeline to permit multiple staging hub deployments to get automatically updated.
Task list
The content you are editing has changed. Please copy your edits and refresh the page.
Context
When we designed the current CI/CD system for deploying hubs as it currently stands, we did so with the principle that there'd only be one staging hub per cluster. Shared clusters would share the staging hub as it was supposed to be a canary deployment. Hence the deployer by design only looks for one staging hub per cluster.
However, we've been terrible at enforcing that principle, as evidenced by the existence of the ucmerced-staging hub. And that means that these hubs don't get automatically updated by the CI/CD pipeline. So we should probably do a refactor of the deployer and CI/CD pipeline to permit multiple staging hub deployments to get automatically updated.
Task list
Tasks
Definition of Done
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: