Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature Req.] Better user-facing API #29

Open
steven-murray opened this issue Jan 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

[Feature Req.] Better user-facing API #29

steven-murray opened this issue Jan 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@steven-murray
Labels
API Breaking A change that breaks backwards compatibility type: feature: code New ability in the code (user-side) type: refactor Code refactoring / restyling for internal benefit
Milestone
v1

Comments

@steven-murray
Copy link
Member

I think the user-facing API at the moment is a little unintuitive. Various methods are exposed, such as setup, which the user should never have to call (they are called by the MCMC routine itself).

I think we should think hard about a better API.
@steven-murray steven-murray self-assigned this Jan 10, 2020
@steven-murray steven-murray added API Breaking A change that breaks backwards compatibility type: feature: code New ability in the code (user-side) type: refactor Code refactoring / restyling for internal benefit and removed enhancement labels Sep 30, 2020
@steven-murray steven-murray added this to the v1 milestone Jan 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@steven-murray steven-murray

Labels
API Breaking A change that breaks backwards compatibility type: feature: code New ability in the code (user-side) type: refactor Code refactoring / restyling for internal benefit
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@steven-murray